Johann Georg Schwanthaler

Aurolzmünster 1740 - Gmunden 1810

Pair of groups depicting three dogs attacking a lion and three dogs attacking a panther

Terracotta

Cm 18 x 34 x 14,2

Johann Georg Shwanthaler was an Austrian sculptor, son of the sculptor Franz Mathias Schwanthaler (1714-1782). He first trained as a sculptor with his father, then with his grandfather Johann Franz (1683-1762) and his uncle Johann Peter the Elder (1720-1795).He was a collaborator of the sculptor Welser Ignaz Mähl. In 1765 he married his daughter Maria Anna and moved to Gmunden, where he ran his own sculpture workshop.In the parish church of Kematen on Krems there are various statues executed by Schwanthaler
Many works by the artist are now enshrined in the collections of the Stifts of Schlierbach and Kremsmünster and in the treasure of the Holy Chapel at Altötting.
Many figures are attributed to him for the cribs of the Altmünster and Kematen in Krems as well as the statues of the four fathers exposed in the choir of the parish church hl. Martin at Kematen on the Krems.Schwanthaler had four sons with his wife: Franz Carl, Maria Juliana, Franz Xaver and Johann Carl. Franz Xaver continued to work after his father's death in Gmundner's sculpture workshop, but he never managed to match his father's artistic success.

 

Comparative literature: Die Bildhauerfamilie Schwanthaler, 1633 - 1848, Vom Barock zum Klassizismus 1974

Read more

Giovanni Darif

Venice 1801 - Milan 1871

The abduction of the Venetian wives

Oil on Canvas Cm 27.7 x 38.7

This canvas is a modello for the finished painting by Darif which he exhibited in Brera in 1829, of which the location is now unknown. A signed preparatory watercolour also exists, which was offered at Bertolami Fine Art, Rome, 9 May 2019, lot 8. 

The subject matter is based on a legend which recounts that on the same day every year all the maidens and young men of Venice were gathered in the church of San Pietro in Castello. The men then chose their future bride following which a huge ceremony took place to marry all the couples, presided over by the Bishop. On 31 January 944 A.D., a band of pirates from Trieste burst into the church, kidnapped the women and seized all of the riches that had been offered by the future spouses.

 

Bibliography: F. Zanotto "Storia della pittura veneziana", Venice 1837, pp 418 - 419

Read more

Attributed to John Gibson RA

Conway 1790 - Rome 1866

Narcissus

Terracotta

45 x 68 x 38 cm

John Gibson RA is best known for his exquisite depictions of figures from classica mythology, working in the neoclassical tradition of Antonio Canova (1757 – 1822) and Berthel Thorvaldsen (1770 – 1844), in Rome. He was perhaps the leading British sculptor of the nineteenth century and enjoyed the patronage of high-profile clients including: Queen Victoria of Great Britain, the Duke of Devonshire, Count Erwein of Schönborn, Alessandro Torlonia and Tsar Nicholas I of Russia. In 1833 Gibson was elected Associate of the Royal Academy in London and five years later was sworn in as a full member, exhibiting there between 1816 and 1864. He had an illustrious artistic career and received many international honours, including the Légion d'Honneur, which was awarded to him by the French government in 1864.

 John Gibson arrived in Rome on 20th October 1817, aged 27, with four letters of recommendation from Sir George D’Aguilar, Henry Fuseli (1741 – 1825), John Flaxman (1755 – 1826) and from Lord Brougham. The impact the ‘Eternal City’ had on the ambitious young sculptor cannot be overstated. For at this time, it was the centre of the contemporary and classical art world and had an unrivalled abundance of ancient masterpieces, which sculptors could copy and take direct inspiration from, on a daily basis. Gibson once famously declared: “I thank God for every morning that opens my eyes in Rome” and indeed, he remained a resident of the city his whole life, leaving only for important commissions (for example, to carve his two portrait statues of Queen Victoria in 1844 and 1850) and during the revolutionary events of 1847-1849, during which time he moved to Lucca.

 In addition to the antiquities of Rome, one of the greatest artistic influences on Gibson was Antonio Canova, who was celebrated as Europe’s leading artist and regarded as the ‘Phidias of his time’. During his education in Canova’s bustling studio between 1817 and 1822, he had the opportunity to work in clay. He would have observed the practice of Canova making small terracotta models, or bozzetti, which were then worked up into a full-scale clay model, to be finally cast in plaster and enlarged by his studio assistants for translation into marble, using a curious contraption known as a ‘pointing machine’. There exists a fascinating account of the young John Gibson learning to work with clay in Canova’s studio, under the watchful eye of his main assistant Antonio D’Este:

 “At my own request Canova allowed me to copy his fine Pugilist – the marble statue in the Vatican. I began with great zeal to model my copy from the cast in the studio. After I had worked at the clay for a few days, down it all fell! It seems that my master had observed to his foreman, Signor Desti (Antonio D’Este), that my figure must fall, ‘for you see’, said he, ‘that he knows nothing of the skeleton work – but let him proceed, and when his figure comes down, show him how the mechanical part is done.’ So when the model fell, a blacksmith was called in, and the iron work was made, with numerous crosses of wood and wire.” Gibson also perhaps learned a great deal about the art of clay modelling during a brief time working under Joseph Nollekens, who is famed for the bravura of his terracotta ‘pensieri’ – as he referred to them. Indeed, a model of Theseus and the centaur by Gibson was included in the sale of Nolleken’s effects at Christies in 1823.

 Canova was a huge influence on Gibson during his early years in Rome. Not only did he support him with artistic and technical advice, but he also assisted in establishing the framework for the young sculptor’s career. Gibson was affectionately called the ‘British Canova’ by many and referred to himself as ‘Canova’s last pupil’ in a letter to Antonio Gacini, Secretary of the Royal Academy in Milan in 1861: “The first instruction which I received in my art was from an Italian. It was Canova whose pupil I became in the year 1817 and studied under him for five years when he died. I was his last pupil.”

 However, Gibson was no mere copyist. His work is markedly distinct from the great Italian’s and has a softer, perhaps more human quality. John Gibson was one of the few remaining exponents of the ‘pure’ neoclassical style of sculpture, who sought to achieve ‘ideal’ classical forms, while on the whole, his contemporaries and rivals were pursuing notions of formal naturalism, or ‘verismo’, such as depicting modern subjects wearing the contemporary fashions of the day.

Inspired by the writings of Johann Joachim Winckelmann (1717 – 1768), Gibson aimed to achieve ‘the sublime and the purest beauty’ in his sculpture through study of the human form perfected to the standards of classical sculpture. The strong influence of the antique can be seen in the composition of the present work. The inspiration for the general form of this terracotta Narcissus was perhaps taken from the Capitoline Gaul or Dying Gladiator (fig.1), while the Centocelle Eros of the Vatican (fig.2) could have provided a model for the downward tilting attitude of the head and the thick curls of shoulder-length hair.

By 1821, Gibson had established his own studio in the Via Fontanella, just off the artistic hub of the via Babuino. The first major work of his own conception was his Sleeping Shepherd Boy  from 1824 (fig.3), made for Lord George Cavendish. Gibson reinterpreted this theme a number of times, making other versions for the Duke of Northumberland and a Mr Lenox of New York. This terracotta Narcissus is depicted in a similarly languid pose and adopts a comparably relaxed countenance. Their heavy heads are bowed, both in drowsy dream-states, full unconscious slumber in the case of the Shepherd Boy, while Narcissus is caught in a trance-like day-dream, as he stares into the water below, enamoured with the beautiful appearance of his own reflection. Their torsos are also gently ‘crunched’, with their abdominal muscles engaged in a similar contorsion (fig.4). Anatomically perfect, both models demonstrate the education Gibson received, not just from studying the ancient models which of course abounded in his adopted city, but the anatomy classes he attended in Britain, led by Dr Vose, who dissected human corpses for his students.

In 1830 Gibson is known to have made a Narcissus in marble for Lord Barrington and subsequently made two others for a Mr Evrington and a Mr Fort of Manchester. He returned to the theme again, sending a Narcissus to the Royal Academy as a submission for his diploma work in 1838 (fig.5). In Ovid’s version of the story of Narcissus and Echo in his Metamorphosis, the nymph Echo fell in love with a beautiful young hunter called Narcissus. But her love was not returned and Echo was condemned by the goddess Juno to repeat only the last words that were spoken to her. As a punishment for spurning Echo’s love, Narcissus was made to fall in love with his own reflection and expired gazing at himself in a pool of water. In his place a flower grew and which took on his name. It is a tragic tale and one of the most famous surviving from antiquity and so would have been an enticing subject for Gibson. The inspiration for the Royal Academy’s example was apparently the sight of a boy sitting on the edge of a fountain that Gibson noticed during a morning walk along the Monte Pinciano, thus satisfyingly combining an observed genre scene with a well-known classical allegory.

 The handling of the head and facial details of the terracotta Narcissus appears to be very similar to the marble work of the same subject that Gibson sent to the Royal Academy in 1838 (fig.6 and 6a) and also his Cupid disguised as a Shepherd Boy at Yale (fig.7). Specifically, their slim, pointed noses, their small, plump, slightly parted lips and their heavy-lidded, blank, pupil-less eyes – in the manner of the ancients. The clay figure’s remarkable head of deep, shoulder-length curls also has much in common with those carved by Gibson for his marble Narcissus, but also to his Love tormenting the soul, at the Walker Art Gallery, Liverpool. It is also interesting to compare the positioning, modelling and anatomical style of the hands and feet of the terracotta model to the marble Narcissus and the Sleeping Shepherd Boy, respectively - for their smooth, yet pronounced, squared-off knuckles and deeply incised nails must surely have been made by the same master.

 When one compares the physiognomic details of this newly discovered terracotta with other major works from Gibson’s oeuvre, the comparisons are so striking that it seems almost certain that the present terracotta is by the hand of John Gibson. The model therefore represents an important art historical discovery for scholars and collectors of European neoclassical sculpture: it adds another model to Gibson’s oeuvre, revealing a different conception of the subject of Narcissus based on ancient archetypes available to Gibson in Rome. In conjunction with this, it also expands our understanding of the types of media that he used in his own artistic practice and increases our appreciation of the skill and facility he had in modelling clay.

 

 

 

Read more

Federico Moja

Milan 1802 - Dolo 1885

Venice, a View of the Campo Santi Giovanni e Paolo, with the Equestrian Monument to Bartolomeo Colleoni and the Scuola Grande di San Marco in the Background

Oil on Canvas Cm 74,5 x 104,5

Signed and dated 1845 lower right

After attending the Brera Academy, Federico Moja specialized in perspective painting under the guidance of Giovanni Migliara, from whom he acquired the ability to elevate the genre of urban views of everyday life into timeless architectural records. The striking cropping of the present composition and emphasis on perspective blend his learnings from his teacher with his own aesthetic characterised by the dramatic juxtaposition of light and colour.

Benedetto Bermani writes 'The school created by Migliara has in Moja one of those followers who have the power to detach themselves from the cold imitation of the great masters, to create their own style, daring, fertile, rich in effects and originality and which reveals an industrious imagination, which, respecting the laws of art, knows how to find unexpected implications. I will not tell you that Moja is perfect in design, exact in reproducing the most minute peculiarities of a building and of a monument... What I admire most in Moja is the splendor of the effects that he knows how to draw from art, whose boundaries appear so limited. The dazzling richness in the play of light, the comic or elegant or profound inspirations that reveal themselves from his sketches, make him an artist apart, since he was able to find an abundant source of ideas...' (Benedetto Bermani in AlbumEsposizione di belle arti in Milano, 1842, p. 78).

We are grateful to Dr. Fabrizio Magani for confirming the attribution.

Read more

Attributed to Giacomo Raffaelli

Rome 1753 - 1836

Greek Comedy Masks

Rosso and Giallo Antico marble relief

Cm 25 x 27

The Raffaelli were Roman kilns and in the second half of the seventeenth century they supplied the Vatican with vitreous material, in the form of colored square tesserae, to make mosaics. In their kilns the Raffaelli therefore produced stuff that is used to make mosaics, that is, vitreous enamels cut into white or colored tiles, such as white lattimio, red lead and gold sheets. On the death of Paolo Raffaelli, the furnace was inherited by his three sons: Francesco, Antonio and Giacomo - the eldest son - who ran it.

Giacomo Raffaelli moved the workshop, first to Piazza di Spagna, then to Via del Babuino, 92. With the help of Cesare Aguatti, around 1775 he conceived the micro-tesserae mosaic, called filato or romano, obtaining it from a siliceous compound which, incandescent, it could be spun and then cut into tiny segments. The micromosaic was an idea to build a great illusion, that is to make the masterpieces, even the most perishable ones, stable and reduce them in size to the point of making them works of art to wear or carry in your pocket. He made tiny plaques in micromosaic with landscapes, with Roman monuments (sometimes in the form of a whim), with flowers, with birds, with religious or mythological subjects. These plates, mounted in metal, glass or marble or wood or hard stone boxes, were then applied on snuff boxes or mounted on brooches, on elements for necklaces, on rings, on caskets, on buttons: they became expensive souvenirs. , for travelers on the Grand Tour. Giacomo Raffaelli exhibited micromosaics for the first time in his atelier in Piazza di Spagna, on the occasion of the Holy Year 1775. The frame motif he used to finish his micromosaics was typical: a chain of white tiles with blue tiles inside, between two rows of red tiles. The invention had many followers and between 1824 and 1830 the area between Piazza di Spagna and Piazza del Popolo contained 68 commercial activities related to micromosaic.

His circular plaque with Pliny's doves, dated 1778, is in the British Museum and another example is in the Napoleonic Museum in Rome: the theme was repeated several times by him. A Goldfinch, micromosaic medallion, from 1778, is kept in the Museum of Santa Giulia, in Brescia.

In 1787 Stanislaus II Augustus Poniatowski, the last king of Poland, appointed him a Polish noble and his advisor for the Liberal Arts. A fervent republican, Giacomo was involved in Milan, in 1808, in anti-Napoleonic political riots and was arrested, but immediately released.Most of the vitreous enamels produced by the Raffaelli furnace, starting from 1804, were exported to Milan, where Giacomo had opened a school of mosaic art in the former convent of San Vincenzino, connected to the Brera Academy, then directed by Giuseppe Bossi. By decree of 24 April 1807 the viceroy Eugenio Beauharnais ordered him a life-size copy of Leonardo da Vinci's Last Supper. The work, in which his son Vincenzo and the mosaicists Giuseppe Roccheggiani and Gaetano Ruspi collaborated, lasted many years and was possible thanks to the mosaic tiles, produced by the Raffaelli furnaces and coming from Rome. This inscription, placed at the foot of the mosaic, celebrated both the art of the mosaicist and the intentions of the client to preserve, in a stable mosaic work, the image of Leonardo's fresco which was already in poor condition at that time:

MVSIVVM OPUS IACOBI RAFFAELLI QUO IN COENA DOMINI TO LEONARDO VINCIO MEDIOLANI MIRIFICE PICTA MCDXCVII TEMPORVM HOMINVMQVE INIVRA PAENE DELETA POSTERITATES SERVARETVR

The work was destined for the Louvre, but after the fall of Napoleon it was claimed by the Habsburgs, who took it to Vienna on 11 August 1818. The Italians residing there asked that the mosaic of Leonardo's work be placed in the Italian National Church of Vienna (church of the Minorites of Vienna), on an altar made by the architect Friedrich August von Stache. The mosaic was moved to the new location on March 26, 1847.

In Brera, in 1814, a selection of art objects was exhibited, produced by Giacomo Raffaelli and his students ː a clock decorated with marble, semiprecious stones, mosaics and bronzes; table tops in white marble, set with mosaic and agate, lapis lazuli, carnelian and malachite elements; mosaic paintings representing birds.In 1815 Giacomo Raffaelli returned to Rome. The Tsar of Russia appointed him as his adviser and from him he bought mosaic paintings and mosaic-topped tables that are now in the Hermitage Museum. Giacomo made the detachment of the mosaic of the basilica of San Paolo fuori le mura, to restore it, after the fire of 1823 that had devastated the basilica.

He was elected academic of San Luca and was buried in Rome, in the church of San Stanislao of the Polish Nation, in via delle Botteghe Oscure. The Raffaelli furnace continued to produce micromosaics for jewelery and enamels for the Fabbrica di San Pietro, until 1864, under the direction of Vincenzo Raffaelli, son of Giacomo.

The work refers to Raffaelli's workshop for table desers in colored marble inspired by antiquity and can be dated around 1780.

The gilded silver Frame probably by Paolo Spagna (Rome 1736 - 1788) or Luigi Valadier (Rome 1726 - 1785)

Read more

Francesco Righetti

Rome 1749 - 1819

The Borghese Gladiator

Bronze with Dark Patina

Cm 31 High

The present bronze sculpture was made after the famous Greek marble of a young fighter portrayed in the act of protecting himself from the aggression of the enemy with the shield which, originally, had to be attached to the left arm raised on guard. The bronzetto, with a dark patina in imitation of ancient bronzes, rests onto a base, also of bronze, bearing the signature "F[rancesco] RIGHETTI F[ecit] ROMAE 1787." The original marble, now in the Louvre, can be dated to the first century BC. It was discovered in Nettuno, near Rome, in 1611, eventually becoming one of the most prized pieces in the collection of Cardinal Scipione Borghese, from which it took its name, before being acquired by Napoleon in 1807 to decorate the Salle d'Apollon at the Musée Napoléon.

Particularly appreciated for the anatomical accuracy with which the muscles are rendered in the extremely harmonious athletic gesture, the sculpture was reproduced in large and small scale since the seventeenth century. The bronzesmiths active in Rome in the second half of the eighteenth century did not fail to include this model in their productions. The “bronze of the Gladiator Borghese, one and a half inches high” was one of the most requested pieces in the manufactory of Giacomo Zoffoli (1731- 1785), active since the beginning of the 1760s in Via degli Avignonesi. There, the bronze was sold for sixteen scudi, and was particularly popular with French and English Grand-Tourists, who paired it with other models after ancient statuary to adorn the interiors of their city residences. Versions of the Gladiator Borghese were found in the collections of Francis Russell, Marquis of Tavistock (1735–67), decorating his Thanet House in London between 1761 and 1762 and now in Woburn Abbeyof Elizabeth Percy , Duchess of Northumberland (1716–76), in her residence overlooking Trafalgar Square, now divided between Syon House and Alnwick Castleand of Sir Lawrence Dundas (1710–81), where it was arranged in a particularly elegant composition on the chimney of the Dressing Room of his London house, as depicted by Johann Zoffany (1733–1810) in 1769

 

We are grateful to Dr. Chiara Teolato for confirming the attribution.

Read more